Lauren Taylor
You can go to any country in the world and see an
advertisement for a musician that is identical to an advertisement shown in
America. Why? Branding. Branding has become a necessary element for any
musician or band to become successful not only in America, but also, throughout
the world.
As stated in an article titled, Musician Marketing: Branding, “A branded image establishes you as a
legitimate musician…and it presents upsell opportunities such as apparel, hats
and other merchandise. Without a branded image, all you have is a name.” The
truth of the matter is that most people will recognize a band first by their
music, and second by their brand. If you were talking to a younger kid about
the Rolling Stones, they might not know who you are talking about right away.
If you explain the Rolling Stones as the band with the lips and tongue logo,
there is a better chance that they will know who you are talking about. This
might be a dated example, but the Forty Licks cover is an image that is still
used on merchandise, online, and in advertisements to this day. Just as some
people are visual learners and some are auditory learners, some people remember
bands from just their music, and others need something visual to remember them
by.
In the article titled, Music
and Branding: Sell-out or Buy-in?, the author writes, “Even though there
will always be detractors who feel any association with corporate America is a
‘sell-out,’ well, ‘Times, they are a’changin’.” Originally, music and branding
did not go hand in hand. Even today, some people may be worried that their
favorite rebellious group will be a sell-out if they begin a career by branding
their image. The idea of being branded with a corporation can create a negative
image about that band. Fans used to view bands that worked on branding as
caring more about money than they do about their artistic ability. In a New
York Times article by Ben Sisario,
Looking to a Sneaker for a Band’s Big Break, it is stated, “And while a
generation ago these arrangements would have carried a stigma for artists,
branding deals are now as common in rock as guitars.” Today it’s almost seen as
though when a band decides to sign with a brand, it is the same decision as
when a band decides to sign with a record label (Sisario).
Even artists that have made their mark in the music industry
are still benefiting from branding. In the article, Madonna crowned top music earner in 2012 due to world tour, it is
discussed how Bruce Springsteen released a number one album in 2012, but a
large majority of his revenue came from merchandise sales. The majority of his
earnings came from his artistic talent and fame, but because of branding, he
was able to bring in even more earnings. Branding gives the musician an
opportunity to target fans that may not be able to make it to a concert or
tour, but instead can buy merchandise to support their favorite artist. If he
or any other famous artist had stuck solely to their music, they would not be
nearly as well known, or well off as they are because of the merchandise and
memorabilia they get to sell and promote themselves with thanks to branding.
Brands like Converse have begun a new trend of opening
studios to try to sponsor new bands. These bands will be getting better record
deals while working with through these brands, but are still having all of
their own artistic freedom. Converse has said that they are doing this not only
to “give back” to its loyal customers, but also to build good will for the
brand, and generate future sales. If a band becomes popular through a record
contract with a brand rather than a record label, not only will the band will
achieve success, but the brand will also benefit from having brought the band
to the public eye, therefore giving the band automatic advertising.
A musician’s artistic ability as either a songwriter or
performer is what inspires them to be successful in their field. That artistic
ability is what brings in fans and creates original pieces that are favorites
for years to come. However, music is just as much of a business as anything
else. Any artist that wants to be known needs to know how to sell themselves to
make a profit. They need to know that their artwork, imagery, and personality
are all a part of the product they are trying to sell, along with the music
they create.
Based off of this information, it is easy to see how both
the musician and the company will benefit from branding. However the real
question is: will musicians and their audiences ever truly understand that
branding is a necessary aspect for bands to succeed, or will they always place
a stigma on the musicians that decide to go the branding route?
Flattum, Jerry.
"Music and Branding: Sell-out or Buy-in?" Technorati Entertainment. Technorati.com, 26 Aug. 2012. Web. 22 Mar. 2013.
"Musician
Marketing: Branding." PsPrint.com. PsPrint.com, n.d.
Web. 22 Mar. 2013.
Reuters.
"Madonna Crowned Top Music Earner in 2012 Due to World Tour." Yahoo! Music. Yahoo! Music,
22 Feb. 2013. Web. 22 Mar. 2013.
Sisario, Ben.
"Looking to a Sneaker For a Band's Big Break." The New York Times. The New York Times, 10 Oct. 2010. Web. 22 Mar. 2013.
Lauren,
ReplyDeleteBranding in music is something that is a necessary evil I believe. A brand is really necessary for anything to survive and thrive in the market place. This applies directly to musicians because they are completely at the whims of the people who listen to them, therefore they have to seem as marketable and relatable as possible. There are many artists out there who seem to have their brand down pat, even if its something that we complain about. Artists like Taylor Swift, Ke$ha, and Madonna put on a show that is more like a spectacle, more about what people expect from then than the actual music. We all complain about how Taylor Swift writes about her boyfriends and only dates celebrities so she can write a song about them and make a ton of profit off of it. But what if in her next album there wasn’t a single song about an ex-boyfriend? Would we like it? Probably not, because the only singles that generally get released off her albums are the ones that are going to cause the most buzz with people. I know every celebrity gossip blog I read wants to know whom “Trouble” or “We Are Never Getting Back Together” is about. She would be boring without the drama that surrounds each of her releases. Ke$ha is the same way, we would be totally disappointed if she put out a record of ballads instead of her party and get wasted anthems. She might actually be the smartest when it comes to her own brand because she knew right from the start what would work. She’s not a dumb girl even though that’s what her music would lead you to believe. She is actually a certified genius with an IQ of over 140 and a near perfect SAT score. Being sleazy and reckless is merely her act and her brand, something that has worked very well for her over the years.
Madonna is probably the best example of how branding can keep someone relevant for a long period of time. She has put out countless albums, some hits some misses. But she knows how to bounce back from an album flop, and that is to put on an insane world tour playing all of her old hits. According to Reuters, “The 54-year-old Material Girl topped Billboard Magazine's annual list of 40 top money makers for the second time after earning an estimated $32 million - 93.5 percent of her revenue - from her 88-date "MDNA" tour, 2012's biggest tour.” Following her on the magazine’s top 40 were Bruce Springsteen, Pink Floyd, and Van Halen. These are not people who are truly relevant today, but who can put on a great show and sell their branded merchandise. Arbitron describes Classic Rock as “a reliable performer in all market sizes, and is the second most popular music format among Men 35-54 (next to Country).” They can get this reliability from the sheer act of branding and for this reason, will never go out of style if they keep touring.
Reuters. "Madonna Crowned Top Music Earner in 2012 Due to World Tour." Yahoo! Music. Yahoo! Music, 22 Feb. 2013. Web. 26 Mar. 2013.
"Radio Today 2012: How America Listens to Radio." Www.arbitron.com. Artbitron, 2012. Web. 23 Feb. 2013.