Sunday, April 7, 2013

Media's Effects on Sports


Media’s Effects on Sports

Sporting events generated approximately $10.9 billion in advertising in 2011, and the biggest advertisers made up an astounding 26% of the total spent. The total time sporting events were aired across national television reached 42,500 hours in 2011, a 5% increase from 2010. The increased coverage of sporting events is directly related to the increased amount of money spent on advertisement.

Whenever the financial relationship between two different industries, in this case sports and the media, there is going to exist some complex relationships that will not always be apparent to the viewers. Since sports as a whole are directly influenced by the income generated by the media, the media can, in response, have a very significant impact on the social perception of sports. Since the overall objective of the media is to generate the most income possible, there is some concern as to whether their representation of sports actually mirrors reality, or if the media’s coverage of sports is a construction of their alternative motives.

The media has obviously helped sporting organization in terms of improving their overall coverage, but sports have also lost a good amount of control over their destiny and activities. The tradeoff that sporting organization make is that they lose control of some of the details such as date, time, and the choosing of a venue. The media determines these details based on their economic interests and what will generate the most viewers. Even something as prominent and huge as the World Cup is influenced by media preferences. The tournament now involves more teams and covers a longer time span, which is a direct influence of the relationship between media and sport.

The increased control that the media has had on sports means that they are often in a position to manipulate and dictate the characteristics of sports. Some of the media’s influences include creating new competitions, leagues, and events that they believe with improve their bottom line. Even specific details of the sports itself are manipulated to increase coverage. Rules and playing conditions have often been modified in some way as a direct result of the media. Team uniforms and playing gear have also been adjusted in certain ways to increase popularity. Team equipment, such as baseball bats and the types of balls used for soccer, have also been played around with by the media to see what will generate the most exciting and high scoring games. Viewers are much more likely to watch a sporting event that is high scoring and exciting, and the media has found ways to change the dynamics of certain sports to appeal to the fans.

This is not a revolutionary discovery by the media. Viewers are much more likely to view material that they enjoy and that is consistent with what they enjoyed watching in the past. Arthur Raney, in his article Why We Watch and Enjoy Mediated Sports, opens with an explanation of how viewers seek to avoid material that is not consistent with their beliefs, a phenomenon known as selective exposure. Sporting events are not different in that many viewers are seeking to reconfirm something they have seen in the past that they have enjoyed viewing. It is the media’s belief that it is up to them, and not the sporting organizations themselves, to control the coverage and presentation of sports in a way that appeals to the viewers and fans. One of the main satisfactions that fans get by viewing mediated sporting event is through their support for one team or another. Even if fans may feel negative feelings if they view the team they support lose, they still gain the initial satisfaction of engaging in the excitement and thrill of the game.

Since fans have such an emotional attachment to the thrill of the game, the media has taken it upon them to continue to deliver a spectacle that will have fans returning for chance to replicate the same feelings they experienced in the past. Even the colors and designs of the uniforms can add to the spectacle and drama of the event. New stadiums have been built to involve extensive advertising opportunities. Sports have pretty much evolved into a product that can be manufactured and sold. Sport organizations are on board with this relationship with the media and often make the changes that are requested. English soccer, for example, was once strictly a Saturday afternoon ritual, but a request from television companies for more games to fill their schedules has now made it an almost daily event.

Changes are also often made to improve interest when a sport has been struggling in terms of viewership.  A number of female sports now have the athletes wearing tighter fitting clothing. Rules changes to hockey have been made to speed up the play of the game. Lots of times the schedule of the games are much more fitting for the media than the athletes themselves. It is an interesting dynamic that the very athletes that fans expect to perform at world class levels are compromised in their performance because the fans needs are put before the athlete. 

So the biggest concern is whether or not the media should have such a claim to the fate of sporting events. Overall, the media is attempting to create a spectacle that is more exciting and engaging for the viewer, but whether or not this compromise is good for the sports themselves seem to be questionable. Athletes are some of the most effected by the media’s influence since their needs are often the ones compromised when making these decisions.

Sources

Stead, David. "Chapter 10." Sport and Society: A Student Introduction. London: Sage Publications, 2003. N. pag. Print.

State of the Media: 2011 Year in Sports. N.p.: Nielson, 2012. Print.

Raney, Arthur A., and Jennings Bryant. "Why We Watch and Enjoy Mediated Sports." Handbook of Sports and Media. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates, 2006. N. pag. Print.

Jim, Whiskey. "The Media and Sports." CBS Sports. N.p., 17th Feb. 2009. Web.

Sexuality in Women's Sports


When we look at sports coverage anymore, we can see a marked difference in the way that men and women are portrayed onscreen. The most significant difference is the overt sexuality that the media tries to plaster on all forms of advertising for women’s sports. This was clearly seen in the coverage of the 2012 London Olympics this past summer. While some people were looking forward to watching the extreme sports spectacle, there were many who were mainly looking forward to the revealing women’s sports outfits and uniforms. In an article from the Daily News, Christina Boyle writes of beach volleyball, “Even the Mayor of London Boris Johnson has embraced the sport, writing in a newspaper editorial that the sight of "semi-naked women" who are "glistening like wet otters" is one of the top 20 reasons the Games are already a resounding success.”
Throughout the games there were a variety of references to sexuality and appearances that competed with actual sports reporting. The Hollywood Reporter even posted a photo gallery called the Superficial Person’s Guide to the Olympics that highlighted the nails on the women in the games as well as their “sexy posteriors” and even went on to objectify the men in the games as well stating, “As statuesque male chests got the once-overs (exhibit A: U.S. swim-team hotties) and female bottoms usurped the attention from their tops, it seems the tables have upended.” It is this kind of reporting that begs the question, what are we really watching sports for? And are people tuning into women’s sports for the game or for the bodies? I think it is safe to say that most of us who do watch women’s sports actually have some interest in the actual game but do advertisers play to that interest?
            When we look at sports advertising we never see women in anything but revealing outfits. An article by the Pittsburgh Post, Sex Sells Sex: Not Women's Sports, highlights one of the most blatant uses of women athletes as sex objects by one of the worst offenders, Sports Illustrated. After Lindsay Vonn won gold in alpine skiing at the Vancouver Winter Olympics, Vonn was given the cover that “Rather than emphasize her singular athletic talent, the magazine depicted Ms. Vonn in a posed phallic photograph, smiling at the camera in her ski regalia backside arched at a 45-degree angle while superimposed over a mountain peak.” The article also goes on to say that marketers and sports journalists “believe that reaffirming traditional notions of femininity and sexuality is a critical sales strategy. This approach, the argument goes, reassures (especially male) fans, corporate sponsors and TV audiences that females can engage in highly competitive sports while retaining a nonthreatening femininity.” The author of this article, Mary Jo Kane, actually went on to conduct a series of focus groups at the University of Minnesota based on gender and age where there were several age groups and both genders represented. They were show photos of female athletes wearing all sorts of clothing ranging from wholesome to soft-core pornography. The results were very straight forward, all audiences were not fans of the sexy pictures of the athletes and were more interested in the ones that showed athletic competence, “both younger and older females, as well as older males, were offended by hypersexualized images. One older male said: "If she [Serena Williams in a sexually provocative pose] were my sister I'd come in, slap the photographer, grab her and leave."
            So does what makes women’s sports attractive, sex or athleticism? Most studies point out sex as the number one reason for women’s sports viewership. This also moves into endorsements as well as the Nielson, “State of the Media: 2011 Year in Sports” reveals when they state that Danica Patrick is among the top five Nascar endorsers, who is most known for her ultra sexy Go Daddy commercials. (9) These commercials are notorious for being barely suitable for broadcast networks when it comes to provocative advertising. When looking at not only the uniforms for women’s sports but the way they are advertised it is clear the type of audience they are looking to bring in. So my last question to you would be is this an ethical way to advertise women’s sports, or should they be more focused on the sport itself? 

Works Cited:

Kane, Mary J. "Sex Sells Sex, Not Women's Sports Yet Sports Coverage Systematically Focuses on the Athletic Exploits of Men and the Sexiness of Women." Pittsburgh Post - GazetteAug 28 2011. ProQuest. Web. 7 Apr. 2013 .

Boyle, Christina. "Olympics 2012: Beach Volleyball Players ‘glistening like Wet Otters’ Says Mayor of London as They Blast Benny Hill Music in Skimpy Uniforms."The Daily News [New York] 21 July 2012: n. pag. Print.

Ginsberh, Merie. "The Superficial Person's Guide to the Olympics." The Hollywood Reporter. N.p., 6 Aug. 2012. Web. 07 Apr. 2013.

"State of the Media: 2011 Year in Sports." Nielson, n.d. Web. 6 Apr. 2013.