Sunday, April 7, 2013

Media's Effects on Sports


Media’s Effects on Sports

Sporting events generated approximately $10.9 billion in advertising in 2011, and the biggest advertisers made up an astounding 26% of the total spent. The total time sporting events were aired across national television reached 42,500 hours in 2011, a 5% increase from 2010. The increased coverage of sporting events is directly related to the increased amount of money spent on advertisement.

Whenever the financial relationship between two different industries, in this case sports and the media, there is going to exist some complex relationships that will not always be apparent to the viewers. Since sports as a whole are directly influenced by the income generated by the media, the media can, in response, have a very significant impact on the social perception of sports. Since the overall objective of the media is to generate the most income possible, there is some concern as to whether their representation of sports actually mirrors reality, or if the media’s coverage of sports is a construction of their alternative motives.

The media has obviously helped sporting organization in terms of improving their overall coverage, but sports have also lost a good amount of control over their destiny and activities. The tradeoff that sporting organization make is that they lose control of some of the details such as date, time, and the choosing of a venue. The media determines these details based on their economic interests and what will generate the most viewers. Even something as prominent and huge as the World Cup is influenced by media preferences. The tournament now involves more teams and covers a longer time span, which is a direct influence of the relationship between media and sport.

The increased control that the media has had on sports means that they are often in a position to manipulate and dictate the characteristics of sports. Some of the media’s influences include creating new competitions, leagues, and events that they believe with improve their bottom line. Even specific details of the sports itself are manipulated to increase coverage. Rules and playing conditions have often been modified in some way as a direct result of the media. Team uniforms and playing gear have also been adjusted in certain ways to increase popularity. Team equipment, such as baseball bats and the types of balls used for soccer, have also been played around with by the media to see what will generate the most exciting and high scoring games. Viewers are much more likely to watch a sporting event that is high scoring and exciting, and the media has found ways to change the dynamics of certain sports to appeal to the fans.

This is not a revolutionary discovery by the media. Viewers are much more likely to view material that they enjoy and that is consistent with what they enjoyed watching in the past. Arthur Raney, in his article Why We Watch and Enjoy Mediated Sports, opens with an explanation of how viewers seek to avoid material that is not consistent with their beliefs, a phenomenon known as selective exposure. Sporting events are not different in that many viewers are seeking to reconfirm something they have seen in the past that they have enjoyed viewing. It is the media’s belief that it is up to them, and not the sporting organizations themselves, to control the coverage and presentation of sports in a way that appeals to the viewers and fans. One of the main satisfactions that fans get by viewing mediated sporting event is through their support for one team or another. Even if fans may feel negative feelings if they view the team they support lose, they still gain the initial satisfaction of engaging in the excitement and thrill of the game.

Since fans have such an emotional attachment to the thrill of the game, the media has taken it upon them to continue to deliver a spectacle that will have fans returning for chance to replicate the same feelings they experienced in the past. Even the colors and designs of the uniforms can add to the spectacle and drama of the event. New stadiums have been built to involve extensive advertising opportunities. Sports have pretty much evolved into a product that can be manufactured and sold. Sport organizations are on board with this relationship with the media and often make the changes that are requested. English soccer, for example, was once strictly a Saturday afternoon ritual, but a request from television companies for more games to fill their schedules has now made it an almost daily event.

Changes are also often made to improve interest when a sport has been struggling in terms of viewership.  A number of female sports now have the athletes wearing tighter fitting clothing. Rules changes to hockey have been made to speed up the play of the game. Lots of times the schedule of the games are much more fitting for the media than the athletes themselves. It is an interesting dynamic that the very athletes that fans expect to perform at world class levels are compromised in their performance because the fans needs are put before the athlete. 

So the biggest concern is whether or not the media should have such a claim to the fate of sporting events. Overall, the media is attempting to create a spectacle that is more exciting and engaging for the viewer, but whether or not this compromise is good for the sports themselves seem to be questionable. Athletes are some of the most effected by the media’s influence since their needs are often the ones compromised when making these decisions.

Sources

Stead, David. "Chapter 10." Sport and Society: A Student Introduction. London: Sage Publications, 2003. N. pag. Print.

State of the Media: 2011 Year in Sports. N.p.: Nielson, 2012. Print.

Raney, Arthur A., and Jennings Bryant. "Why We Watch and Enjoy Mediated Sports." Handbook of Sports and Media. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates, 2006. N. pag. Print.

Jim, Whiskey. "The Media and Sports." CBS Sports. N.p., 17th Feb. 2009. Web.

4 comments:

  1. Ryan

    What your blog reiterates is that every major sports organization is a business, and thus operates accordingly. This is something I’ve recently come to understand (and despise) as a sports fan. The way media controls and regulates sports has changed many facets of each respective sport, much more so than meets the average sports fan’s eye. Much of this does come from advertising, an aspect of media that is constantly being integrated into all forms of media through new and creative ways. Just watch one soccer game and you can see how players’ jerseys are covered in advertisements. Nearly every stadium is named after a major corporation as big businesses pour billions of dollars into having their names attached to facilities. Yet the most influential factor for sports organizations is TV ratings and the advertising money that is generated from that.
    You said in your blog that “the fans’ needs are put before the athlete”, which I agree with. However, the fans’ needs are far less relevant than the needs of advertisers’ money when it comes to running a sports team. When you grow up idolizing a certain sports team, you have this fantasy-world idea that they operate based on their fans’ best interests, winning. While one would think that would be the ultimate goal of a sports team, my perception of this idea has been tarnished. The capitalistic approach to running a business has been implemented into many industries of our society, such as food production. Now, we’re seeing how it has been introduced and strongly executed in the sports world, starting with the league’s front offices.
    To give some examples that I’ve seen recently in the world of sports, the National Basketball Association has gotten attention for being a severely corrupt and dishonest sports organization. In the last decade, the NBA has received more accusations of being a corrupt, completely money-driven business than perhaps any other organization, rivaling the NCAA. Every aspect of the sport seems to have been altered in attempts to generate higher ratings, thus bringing in more money from advertisers. A recent issue has been brought up regarding the officiating of NBA referees and how they give favoring calls to the Los Angeles Lakers. In the NBA, the top eight teams make the playoffs at the ends of the season. The LA Lakers are probably the most popular team in the NBA, thus having a massive fan base and very high ratings for every game. Playoff games’ ratings garner much higher weight, thus higher ratings and advertising money than regular season games. Currently at the #9 spot in the rankings and with playoff time approaching, referees have been noticeably calling games in the Lakers’ favor. Jim Whiskey touches this in his article, noting how basketball officiating is completely based on ratings. Another issue in the NBA is the draft lottery, in which teams are “randomly” selected from a lottery deciding the draft order. The worse a team’s record, the supposed higher chance of them getting the #1 spot is. However, year in and year out the “lottery” seems to favor those teams with more popular fan bases and higher ratings.
    As a sports fan, this does concern me as the integrity of all sports is steadily decreasing as teams and organizations focus more on money than the love for the game itself. Media representations of sports narrow in on superstar athletes much more than teams as a whole, and advertisers alike. However, this doesn’t seem to be much of a trend, but a slowly introduced capitalistic approach that involves catering to the needs of advertisers.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ryan,

    I agree with you that sports have become so intertwined with the media that it is impacting the way a game is played, but I wonder if the media relationship with sports is a good or bad thing for the athletes who play the game or for the fans who are engrossed by the game. Essentially, my question is: is it really a bad thing that media has expanded the sports market to new fans, generating tons of new revenue for athletes and teams?

    In Raney’s article, “Why We Watch and Enjoy Mediated Sports,” he outlines the different motivations of mediated sports viewers. For me, this article reiterates the idea that the media, although it certainly accentuates the game, is not a motivating force for fans to watch the sports they love. Raney concludes that, “the most important motivated factor behind viewing mediated sports is for the enjoyment and emotional satisfaction that comes from cheering on a favored team as it follows an undetermined (yet hoped for) path to victory.” (Raney, 316) I think that with this realization it is unfair to persecute the media for simply enhancing the spectacle.
    The media has created more opportunities for viewers like myself to watch sports that traditionally would not and in some cases still do not attract mainstream viewing. For instance, media attention given to Michael Phelps, Ryan Lochte, Allison Schmidt, and the rest of the U.S. Olympic swim team has allowed for more media attention in the sport of swimming. Prior to the successes of these athletes and others in the same arena swimming was practically impossible to watch on TV with the exception of the Olympics. The dramatization of the sport in conjunction with this particular class of swimmers has allowed for fans such as myself to watch in more ways for more than just that one time. Raney continued, “enjoyment is derived from viewing a favored team compete in a contest,” (Raney, 316) so I personally thank the media for allowing fans to view more readily their favored teams.

    According to Nielsen’s “State of the Media: 2011 Year in Sports”, “in October, 463,664,000 video streams took place on sports websites by 35 million consumers.” (Nielsen, 1) I think it’s safe to say that without major media attention peaking the interests of the consumer streaming games would not have even been considered, let alone become such a widely used medium. Sports are a spectacle, meant to be watched and loved, the media is simply trying to make the game more attractive for all to watch. The athletes that Nielsen highlights in the article are only benefitting from the media attention they receive. Sports obviously has changed from the Babe Ruth era when you knew that every player on the field only played for the love of the game, and weren’t working for that big Gatorade endorsement, but I find it hard to villainize the media for this change. I think it’s great that professional athletics has exploded and given everyone something to watch or play or love. (As per your point about women wearing tighter clothes to make women’s sports more attractive – that’s a different issue in my book.)

    Raney, Arthur A., and Jennings Bryant. "Why We Watch and Enjoy Mediated Sports." Handbook of Sports and Media. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates, 2006. N. pag. Print.

    State of the Media: 2011 Year in Sports. N.p.: Nielson, 2012. Print.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Heya are usіng Worԁprеss for your blοg platfοrm?
    I'm new to the blog world but I'm trying to get ѕtarteԁ and creatе my own.
    Do you nееd any html cοding expertise to mаke your own blοg?

    Any hеlp would be really aρpreciаted!


    Feel free to vіѕit my weblog reputation management

    ReplyDelete
  4. Saved as a fаvorite, I like уour site!

    Mу blog роst :: reputation management

    ReplyDelete